{"id":98,"date":"2009-07-02T00:50:47","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T07:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infosecurity.pro\/?p=98"},"modified":"2019-04-20T16:26:21","modified_gmt":"2019-04-20T16:26:21","slug":"federal-cybersecurity-license-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infosecurity.pro\/?p=98","title":{"rendered":"Federal CyberSecurity License proposal"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\t“systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital to the United States that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitation impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination of those matters.” <\/em>\nThe\u00a0Patriot Act of 2001\u00a0identified a number of critical infrastructures: Agriculture<\/a> and Food<\/a>; Water<\/a> ; Public Health; Emergency Services; Government<\/a>; Defense Industrial Base; Information<\/a> and Telecommunications; Energy<\/a>; Transportation<\/a> and Shipping<\/a>; Banking and Finance<\/a>; Chemical Industry and Hazardous Materials; Post<\/a>; National monuments<\/a> and icons; Critical Manufacturing\nIf the guidelines of the Critical Infrastructure Information Act of 2002 is any indicator, larger implications may lead to the license stipulating mandatory reporting by all\u00a0CyberSecurity Professionals\u00a0of\u00a0all information, including reports, assessments, analyses, and unevaluated intelligence (i.e.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>whether or not such information has been analyzed)<\/span><\/span><\/em>The text of section 7 of the Senate Bill proposal 773 as Introduced in Senate May 29, 2009 reads as such:\n\n\n